FROM CJ Werleman "The New Atheist Threat (The Dangerous Rise Of Secular Extremists)" (Dangerous Little Books: 2015) Chapter 3 - The Echoe Chamber p 36 ff

Generally speaking, New Atheists attend the same events; listen to the same podcasts and speakers; read the same books and blogs; download the same YouTube videos; and follow the same public personalities (atheists) on social media. All of which makes for a high-pitched echo chamber; thus providing those within its orbital spin a perpetual positive feedback loop. ...

The echo chamber also makes fertile soil for ignorance, bad ideas, false assumptions, and groupthink. ...

Many New Atheists are victims of this kind of echo chamber speak. In 2014, I shared a bus ride with popular New Atheist Matt Dillahunty. We had a great chat and he’s a terrific fella, but he told me, “As atheists we have to be experts in theology, anthropology, cosmology, geology, and biology.” Two thoughts came to mind: why? and you’re not. That’s not a slight on Dillahunty. It’s merely an observation that one would have to be smarter than Stephen Hawking to be considered a bona fide expert in each of these respective fields. And the only reason I could think as to why he would believe an atheist has to be an expert in all those fields is if he believes atheists need to evangelize their atheism to religious believers. Worryingly, many New Atheists I have debated or spoken to actually boast that they are experts in many or all of those respective fields even when it’s obvious they have no more than a Wikipedia level understanding of theology, for instance. ...

Fundamentalism, whether it’s religious or secular, is a mindset. It means the ‘Other’ doesn’t need to be investigated or enquired upon. It means believing your worldview has the answers to all of life’s questions. It serves to diminish voices and opinions that do not share the adherent’s worldview, while alternative views are dismissed as unworthy of consideration. “It [fundamentalism] provides a binary world of absolutes, of good and evil,” writes Hedges. “Those who oppose the fundamentalist are dismissed as savages, condemned as lesser breeds of human beings, miscreants led astray by Satan or on the wrong side of Western civilization.” All fundamentalists are hostile to new information and intellectual investigations. All fundamentalists seek out information that only confirms their assumptions and worldview. All fundamentalists otherize in a way that reduces the other to a one-dimensional cartoon caricature. Fundamentalism is the antithesis of intellectualism. ...

an interesting exercise is to visit some of the more popular atheist blogs. What you will find is an intellectual black hole, for there really are only three kinds of New Atheist blog articles:
- Attack critics of New Atheism
- Defend leaders of New Atheism
- Ridicule the religious.
And there’s a reason for this. No celebrity or broadly popular New Atheist is qualified to comment with any authority on politics, geo-politics, history, the Middle East, religious scholarship etc. Thus New Atheists are left with only three avenues to make sense of today’s headlines: attack, defend, ridicule. They call this “intellectualism.”



Dear Bwight Afeeist

I am refreshed and challenged by your unique point of view. You make silence a wonderful thing to look forward to. However I took exception to your recent scribble

I note that:
[X] You were speaking outside your area of expertise
[X] You demonstrated no knowledge of philosophy which is the domain of logic and reason
[X] You demonstrated no knowledge of philosophy of religion which is what you are participating in every time you mention God
[X] You demonstrated no knowledge of the 21st century concepts of the religion that you mentioned

Your attention is drawn to the fact that:
[X] You mindlessly posted the same boring thoughtless cut and paste answers of other atheists with no qualification in the subject area
[X] You repeatedly assumed unwarranted intellectual superiority
[X] You used logical fallacies such as category mistake, strawman fallacy, special pleading and incredulity fallacy
[X] You have no positive argument for atheism

It is recommended that you:
[X] Get an education in philosophy
[X] Devote your life to converting people to atheism in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan.
[X] Start up an Atheist Weason Wally to support other people with your unfortunate affliction

[X] Are you able to read religious texts in any manner other than identical to a Christian fundamentalist?
[X] Exactly how relevant to daily life is your atheism compared to a-invisiblepinkunicornism, a-fairyism, a-flyingspaghettimonsterism, a-santaclausism, a-toothfairyism and a-leprechaunism?
[X] How does your adopted empiricism, scientism, verificationism and humanism directly and logically flow from a lack of belief in a God?
[X] How does one physically measure a non-physical God?
[X] Were you in the special class at school?
[X] Are you from the shallow end of the gene pool?
[X] Do you want fries with that?
[X] Are you able to answer in something other than grunts or swear words?

Please save this message and review it occasionally to determine your progress toward being;
[X] a tolerable afeeist
[X] a fully-functional human being
[X] integrated into humanity
[X] re-integrated into the wild

If what you don't know can't hurt you, you're practically invulnerable.

Thank you for taking the time to read this flame form.

"It is absolutely safe to say that if you meet somebody who claims to be an atheist, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane." - Dick Dorkins



My latest song "I Love You (For Bev) " from the 2016 album "The Place" - original rock available for free download.


I love you
I love you with all my heart
I love you
I love you with all my soul
I love you
I love you with all my strength
I love you
I love you with all my life

I want you
I want you

Like my Facebook Musician page at and get more updates and information regarding my original music.

Hear my original music at - original rock songs for free download.